Mr. Karras responded that he no longer owns any interest in the property, and the Glenn Wayment is the new owner. As this application as past the expiration requirements from its latest approval, it will be filed as a dead file. Any future work for this property will require fresh approvals, fees, service letters, and application.

I emailed Allan Karras today concerning their intentions on this project. This project does expire one year from the time extension that was granted last year.

A request for time extension was granted by staff in July 2013. This project would next expire or record by July 10, 2014.

This subdivision is required to record before July 10, 2013. An one year time extension could be granted by the Planning Commission if requested. The fee for a time extension is $300.00. Once again a time extension request must be completed before 7-10-13 or this subdivision will expire and require to be started a new.

Reeve & Associates submitted new plans on May 7th and I uploaded them today.

This office has completed its 8th review of these subdivisions. There is still a couple of prior red lines that will need to be taken care of. A monument escrow account will need to be set up for 1 monument prior to the Weber County Surveyor's signing of Lisa Estates Phase 2.

Secondary water easements and temporary turn around easements need to be reviewed and recorded.

New plats were added today for review.

This office has completed its 7th review of both Phase 1 and Phase 2. All prior redlines have been addressed and corrected. There are a couple of minor corrections to be addressed.

I received a new swppp. There are still items that the Developer needs to fill out to complete it. The Storm Water Construction Activity Permit needs to be filled out. These items will be checked at the pre-construction meeting.

This email reply was sent to Reeves and Assoc. 3/18/2013 Chris, I sent along the Fenster Farms 6th Review PDF. It was basically the same plat I had reviewed last August with only 1 of the redlines corrected. Lisa Estates, both Phase 1 and Phase 2 were the same. Actually in a couple of cases had less in corrections than prior reviews. Please go through the prior 6 reviews of the 3 subdivisions and correct all the prior redlines before another plat is submitted. Thanks Jack From: Chris Cave [mailto:ccave@reeve-assoc.com] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 9:02 AM To: Haight, Jack Cc: Hatfield, Ben Subject: FW: Lisa 1 and 2 and Fenster Importance: High Jack, I am not sure why we didn't see the last review for Fenster and Lisa 1 & 2. Attached are the modified plats for your review. Let me know if there is anything else you need. Thanks, Chris J. Cave Planner • Project Manager Reeve & Associates, Inc. ccave@reeve-assoc.com 801.621.3100 * 801.621.2666 (Fax)

This office began its 6th review of Phase 1 and 2. Redlines from prior reviews have not been addressed and corrected. When prior comments and redlines have been corrected, submit the revised plat so this office can proceed with the review process.

There is a single phase line on the west side of 5500 West. The capacity of this line will have to be looked at once developer makes request for subdivision. Line extnsion will be in accordance with the current tariffs and regulations.

RMP has facilities on the west side of 5500 West. Line extension to this development will be in accordance with the current tariffs and regulations.

New documents have been submitted for review.

This office completed its 5th review -- 1st review of the re-design. Redlines were mailed to Chris @ Reeves and Assoc.

I briefly looked at the plat but did not see any base flood elevations placed on it.

A new plat has been added for review.

The Notice of Decision has been added. The Western Weber Planning Commission recommended final approval of this subdivision on July 10, 2012.

Staff Report for the Western Weber Planning Commission meeting July 10, 2012 has been added and will be review @ 5:00 pm.

Chad, Why are the needed fire hydrants or water lines not shown on these plans?

Chad, I've added the improvement plans here for your review.

Chris just brought in some hard copies of the updated plans for Lisa Estates and Fenster Farms. He is going to get us some electronic copies on Monday.

New revised plats for ph 1 and 2 have been added for review.

Ben Hatfield is now the project manager for this project.

Has fire received notification of this subdivision. I do not see that they have been notified and there are no responses from them as far as fire hydrant locations.

I looks like new plats were submitted but I have not seen new improvement plans.

Completed this offices 3rd review of both phases of this subd. Emailed to Chris Cave at Reeve & Assoc...8/22/11

As a thought; Large Remaining parcel boundaries need not be drawn to scale since bearings and distances are not required to be shown. (This is purely a discretionary decision though by the person/company submitting the plat) When the size of remaining parcels are large, broken lines can be used showing the basic configuration of the remainder, with the remainder acreage and the required disclaimer inside that. This way the overall scale on the plat can be reduced thus giving the ability to show better detail within the subdivision itself. Showing remainder parcels to scale, on say 7 to 18 acres or so does not create this same problem.

On those last two plats/files uploaded. What good does it do to show 40 acres of a remainder parcel? Details of the subdivision can hardly be made out. I understand that the Subdivision Ordinance requires: "Remaining Parcel: When a division of property leaves a remaining area of 5.00 acres or greater, the remaining parcel boundary and record area will be shown, on the subdivision plat with the note: REMAINING AGRICULTURAL PARCEL, NOT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT. The remaining parcel boundary need not be labeled with bearings or distances." But having a 4 lot, 4 acre subdivision at a scale of 1 inch = 100 feet does no one any good.

In my last review one of my comments was to address and easement on lot 1 for the canal/drainage easement. It has come to my attention that an easement has been recorded E#2531487 on July 22, 2011. This easement needs to be shown if it affects lot 1.

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Engineering" written by Chad Meyerhoffer (Weber County Engineering Division). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

I emailed Chris Cave a copy of the latest Engineering Division review.

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Engineering May 2011" written by Chad Meyerhoffer (Weber County Engineering Division). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Survey Review_2nd review" written by Jack Haight (Weber County Surveyor's Office). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

The 2nd Survey review for Lisa Estates Subdivision Phase 1 and Phase 2 were completed today-5/2/11-and were emailed to Chris Cave at Reeve & Associates

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Survey Review_2nd review" written by Jack Haight (Weber County Surveyor's Office). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Survey Review_2nd review" written by Jack Haight (Weber County Surveyor's Office). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Survey Review_2nd review" written by Jack Haight (Weber County Surveyor's Office). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

The preliminary review was done by this office prior to the use of Miradi....Done 12/29/10

I emailed the minutes to Alan Karras.

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Staff Report to County Commission Concerning Appeal" written by Justin Morris (Weber County Planning Division). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

An email was sent by the system to Allan Karras, applicant, containing the review "Staff Report to County Commission Concerning Appeal" written by Justin Morris (Weber County Planning Division). The email was sent to "alkarras AT aol DOT com".

The applicant has submitted an appeal to the County Commission of the Western Weber Planning Commission's decision for preliminary approval. See the file "Appeal Letter by Applicant of Preliminary Approval".