I watched the planning comission meeting from August 26th where it states that this development has connectivity on the west side and potentially on 6150 West..... as the actual property owner of 6150 West that is so frequently mentioned and also the owner of the 30 acres that land lock this development to the west... I can assure you there is ZERO connectivity nor will there ever be. Mr. Burns and any developers have never even been in contact with us or any of the other people that live on 6150 ( that we have allowed access to) about any part of this development or any plans. We have had to rely on other sources to even know anything about this development. I believe this shows great irresponsibility on the owners/ planners part. I hope they are being honest with the commissioners and all involved in this development about there only being one way that they can access 900 South and that is only on the south side of this development.

I made a comment when this project was submitted under GBAR as well as 2 other people, I am wondering why West Creek and GBAR are not merged together as they are the same parcel. I am also wondering if the same criteria applies to Mr. Burns as it did for Mr. Gibson. The criteria I am referring to is written letters from the neighbors that Mr. Gibson was to acquire saying they are in agreement with the project. In my opinion I find that by not merging the 2 submissions into 1 the comments that were submitted will be lost or ignored, and the same with the criteria that was set for the GBAR submission. 

Invoice added

Items still needed:

-Street connectivity plan (within and beyond subdivision - show street intersections every 660' and pathway/pedestrian intersections every 400')

-Sewer service acknowledgment 

-Parks and open space plan

Please submit the following:

• Street and Pathway Connectivity Plan
  • Neighborhood street, sidewalk, and pathway connectivity plan showing how street and pathway/sidewalk connections can or will be made.
• Parks and Open Space Plan
  • The plan for open space and parks, along with a statement regarding the plan from the local park district.
• Culinary and Secondary Water, and Wastewater Plan
  • If in a sewer or water service area or expansion area, a letter of acknowledgement of the rezone from that service provider. If not within a service area, provide a written plan explaining how these services will be provided.
• Requirements for Master planned communities, or as needed:
  • Concept Development Plans
    • Show development areas, sensitive lands areas including floodplains and landslide hazards, open space areas, and general layout.
  • Traffic Impact Analysis
  • Cost Benefit Analysis
    • The cost/benefit analysis should be compiled in a manner that will help decision makers understand that the costs of the development can be appropriately mitigated by the benefits. The analysis may address actual costs/benefits to the county budget, or cost/benefits of the development to the community generally. The best cost/benefit analyses will frame the analysis based on goals and objectives of the applicable general plan.
  • Recreation Facilities Plan
  • Seasonal Workforce Housing Plan
  • Emergency Services Plan
    • With the plan, including a letter of feasibility from Weber Fire District and Weber County Sheriff's Office
  • Density calculation table showing proposed density calculations
  • Thematic Renderings - demonstrating the general vision and character of the proposed development.