Aggregate processing plants separate mined or imported material into different individual sizes or a combination of sizes for use in materials like concrete, asphalt, road base, and fill material. In general, this sorting processis accomplished through the use of a combination of five main types of equipment; feeders (grizzly and/or tunnel), curshers, screens, transfer conveyors, and stacking conveyors or stackers. The primary purpose of hte feeders is to remove oversized material (typically larger than 5 inces in diameter) and to feed the remaining material into the plant at a constant rate. Crushers (cone, impactor, or jaw types) reduce oversized material into smaller sizes for processing in the screens. The screens separate the material into different sizes, depending on the number of decks. Screens typically have either one, two, or three decks which allow the material to be sorted into two, three, or four different sieve sizes, respectively. In some cases, multiple screen decks are used to make fewer size separations but at a higher production rate by distributing the material over a larger area of screening media. Transfer conveyors are used to efficiently move the material from one piece of equipment or area of the plant to another, and the stackers are used to stack the resulting sorted or blended materials into stockpiles. Because of the varied use and size of each aggregate facility, there is no one specific process train for every plant.
Parcel Number |
---|
100390004 - County Map |
Building Description | Square Feet | Valuation |
---|
Contractor Type | Name | Contact | Address |
---|
List of project documents. Review documents can be found under the Review tab.
Document Name | Date Uploaded |
Options
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Building renderings | |||
Easement documents | |||
Engineered Plans | |||
Geologic hazards study | |||
Geotechnical report | |||
Landscaping Plan | |||
Narrative | |||
Notice of decision | |||
Other | |||
Original 10252013.pdf | 11/7/2013 | ||
Original notice_of_decision_CUP_2012-03.pdf | 6/13/2012 | ||
Original 2012-05-21_Letter_from_Utah_DNR_DOGM.pdf | 5/24/2012 | ||
Original Western_Zirconium_Pit_Map_11x17_2_1.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Western_Zirconium_Pit_Map_Base_Map_1.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Western_Zirconium_Pit_Map_Finished_Grade_1.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Example_Layout.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original FDCP_Western_Zirconium.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Western_Zirc_1.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Western_Zirc_2.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Western_Zirconium_Form_15a.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Small_Mine_Reclamation_Contract_App._-_Western_Zirc..pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Bond_-_Notice_of_Intention_-_Western_Zirc..pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Bond_Form.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Small_Mine_Contract_WZ.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Original Conditional_Use_Permit_Application.pdf | 5/3/2012 | ||
Permits issued | |||
Planning staff report | |||
Signage Plan | |||
Site Plan | |||
Time Extension | |||
Water and Wastewater Plan | |||
Uncategorized Documents |
To access review documents, click on the individual review and the corresponding review documents will be listed under the review.
Planning Review |
Approved |
Jim Gentry | 7/9/2012 | |
Engineering |
Approved |
Michael Tuttle | 6/25/2012 | |
2012-3 Western Zirconium gravel pit |
Approved |
Jim Gentry | 6/13/2012 | |
Weber Fire District Review |
Approved |
Weber Fire District | Ted Black | 5/31/2012 |
Engineering |
Not Approved |
Michael Tuttle | 5/17/2012 | |
Building Inspection Review |
Approved |
Craig Browne | 5/22/2012 |
All followers will be notified of new documents, comments, and reviews to the project.
Name | Date Added |
Options
|
---|---|---|
Ted Black | 1/1/0001 | |
Craig Browne | 1/1/0001 | |
Michael Edwards | 1/1/0001 | |
Jim Gentry | 1/1/0001 | |
Michael Tuttle | 1/1/0001 |
List of all invoices tied to project.
Comments
Have a question? Leave a comment, your comment will be emailed to all project followers.